The Cloudoffis Pulse - Product Updates

Welcome to our first-ever Cloudoffis product newsletter – Cloudoffis Pulse, where we bring you the latest product updates across Tax Sorted, SMSF Auditomation and SMSF Sorted.

This month, we’ve some really exciting updates to share with you. Our incredible product team has been working hard to build the products you’ve asked for.

We hope you enjoy this update

From the product desk:

We are pleased to announce that Cloudoffis has successfully attained ISO 27001 certification. At Cloudoffis, safeguarding your data is our top priority. We are proud that we have achieved ISO 27001 certification, the internationally recognised standard for information security management systems (ISMS).

You can learn more about this here.


Book time with your Account Manager:

If you’re looking to elevate your Cloudoffis experience, book 30 minutes with Jocelyn or Dilnar today.

Meet Jocelyn Meet Dilnar

SMSF Death Benefit Checklist

Introduction:

When a member of an SMSF dies a death benefit may become payable to dependents. Also, if the deceased was an individual trustee or director of the corporate trustee a replacement may be required to ensure the fund can continue to operate and benefits are paid.

Here are some questions which may assist to ensure the correct documents are in place and decisions have been made to support the death benefit payment and the replacement of the trustee.

Depending on the client’s situation and the trust deed, there may be many more questions in addition to those below.

Notification of the Member’s death

  1. Has the trustee been notified of the death of a member or trustee?
  2. Has the trustee received a copy of the death certificate of the deceased or other official recognition of the death of the member or trustee?

Trust deed provisions

Do the governing rules of the fund, such as the fund’s trust deed, have any special requirements in relation to the death of the member or trustee?

Do the governing rules require replacement of the deceased member/trustee or member/director of the corporate trustee with the deceased’s legal personal representative (LPR) before a decision can be made about the payment of the deceased member’s death benefit?

Trustees

  1. Did the fund consist of a single member and a corporate trustee where the single member was the sole director of a corporate trustee?
  2. Did the fund have a corporate trustee and two directors who died simultaneously?
  3. Does the fund have one trustee or director of the corporate trustee who is living?
  4. If the sole director or the directors of a corporate trustee has died the company constitution may provide instructions on how the director is replaced.
  5. Did the deceased have a last will and testament which appointed an executor of their estate who can act as their legal personal representative (LPR)?
  6. If there is no will or LPR, have dependants or those who consider they have a claim to the superannuation of the deceased applied to the court for letters of administration. Has the Court granted letters of administration or is it in progress?

Death benefit powers of attorney and nominations

  1. Did the deceased grant an enduring power of attorney to a person or persons who are acting as the LPR of the deceased?
  2. Did the deceased make a death benefit nomination prior to their death?
  3. Is the death benefit nomination valid in terms of the fund’s governing rules and the law?
  4. Was the death benefit nomination binding or non-binding on the trustee?
  5. If the death benefit nomination is binding, the trustee is obliged to distribute benefits as instructed by the deceased.
  6. If the death benefit nomination was non-binding the trustee may use discretion to distribute benefits as provided in the nomination. However, they are not obliged to distribute benefits as provided in the non-binding nomination.

Payment of death benefit lump sums and pensions

  1. Have dependants of the deceased as at the date of the member’s death been identified for purposes of the SIS Act and Regulations?
  2. Was the deceased in receipt of a pension at the time of their death which provided a reversion to a dependant?
  3. Did the deceased make a valid reversionary pension nomination in accordance with the governing rules of the fund?
  4. Has the trustee made a decision concerning the distribution of death benefits to the dependants of the deceased or to their estate via their LPR?
  5. Are the member’s death benefits required to be paid as lump sums or pensions?
  6. Has more than an interim and final payment been made to the dependant as a lump sum?
  7. Was a pension payable to the surviving spouse if the deceased and surviving spouse were both under age 60 at the time of the member’s death? If so, tax is payable on taxable component of the pension until the surviving spouse is age 60.
  8. If pensions were payable to children of the deceased who are under 18 has the child’s LPR or guardian been identified to receive the payment on the child’s behalf?
  9. Have lump sums payable to the executor of the member’s estate been distributed in accordance with the will of the deceased?

Have trustee minutes and resolutions been made concerning the member’s death, appointment of trustee and payment of benefits to dependants or the member’s estate?

Has the trustee received confirmation of receipt of death benefit or commencement of a death benefit pension by the dependant and/or the estate of the deceased, as relevant?

Have the trustees notified the ATO concerning the amount of tax to be paid in respect of the taxable component of any death benefit lump sum paid to persons who are not death benefit dependants, for example, adult children of the deceased?

Cloudoffis makes preparation, approvals and compliance easy with AI-powered workpapers. As Australia’s leading SaaS provider in the SMSF industry, we bring over 9 years of unparalleled experience.

Pioneers in our field, we take pride in supporting the accounting and auditing community to streamline their workflows and work more efficiently through SMSF Sorted, SMSF Auditomation and Tax Sorted.

Graeme’s Super News - October Edition

Read the latest updates from Graeme Colley, a respected educator, policy advisor, and technical expert with over 30 years' experience in taxation and superannuation.

Graeme’s Super News – October Edition

Read the latest updates from Graeme Colley, a respected educator, policy advisor, and technical expert with over 30 years’ experience in taxation and superannuation.

Update on Division 296

Division 296 amends the income tax law to introduce an additional tax of up to 15% on the increase in a person’s Total Superannuation Balance for the year on balances above $3 million. It was intended to take effect from 1 July 2025.

Based on recent media reports the government has paused progression of the tax. If the legislation does make it into to parliament it may not be in the same form as the original bill which lapsed on 21 July 2025. It may be better to wait until we see whether the legislation will go ahead and, if it does, whether any changes are made to the lapsed bills.

It is rumoured that the $3 million threshold may be indexed which may relieve one of the main issues with the legislation. However, the member’s total superannuation balance which is used to determine the threshold may still include unrealised capital gains in the calculation.

At the moment it’s just wait and see what the government proposes to do.

Amendments to superannuation contributions ruling finalised

Taxation Ruling TR 2010/1 Income tax: superannuation contributions has been amended by TR 2010/1A4 to provide the ATO’s view of the link between the non-arm’s length income provisions in section 295-550 of the ITAA ’97 and superannuation contributions. The amendments are relevant for trustees of super funds, particularly SMSFs, in determining whether the non-arm’s length income rules apply when making in specie contributions.

The amendments to TR 2010/1 also cover value shifting arrangements to exclude those occurring from 28 November 2024. But it covers the ATO’s approach to arrangements entered into prior to that date in Appendix 2 of the Ruling.

In relation to determining whether personal contributions are deductible the amended ruling covers the removal of the maximum earnings test which has applied since 1 July 2017.

Amended non-arm’s length income/expenditure ruling finalised

Law Companion Ruling LCR 2021/2 has been amended by LCR 2021/2A3 to clarify how amendments to section 295-550 of the ITAA ‘97 operate in a scheme where the parties do not deal with each other at arm’s length. It applies where the trustee of small complying superannuation funds, such as an SMSF or SAF incurs non-arm’s length expenditure (or does not incur relevant expenditure) in gaining or producing the fund’s ordinary or statutory income.

The revised ruling provides clarity to a range of NALI/E issues including the difference between services provided as a trustee and in a professional capacity.

ATO SMSF Stats for the June Quarter 2025

The latest SMSF quarterly statistics as at June 2025 were released in early September and highlights the continued growth of SMSFs. The ATO statistics show that there are 653,062 SMSFs which have a total of 1,203,127 members.

During the 2024/25 financial year there was an increase of 38,449 funds, which was a substantial increase over each of the previous three years. Nearly two-thirds of the increase in SMSF memberships has come from the younger age groups. Although over 50% of members are in the 60+ age group.

SMSFs now hold over $1 trillion in assets with the largest asset classes being listed shares and cash and term deposits.

The ATO’s SMSF quarterly statistical reports is available from the ATO website at June 2025 ATO SMSF statistics

Government Audit Office Review of SMSFs

The Australian National Audit Office (ANAO), has listed an audit of the ATO’s regulation of SMSFs for the 2025/26 financial year as well as a follow up audit of employer compliance with Superannuation Guarantee. The ANAO last examined the ATO’s management of SMSFs in 2007, and Superannuation Guarantee non-compliance in 2022.

The review of employer compliance with the Superannuation Guarantee requirements, compliments the introduction of the payday super which is due to commence on 1 July 2026.

Cancellation of Auditor Contravention Reports

If you are an SMSF auditor, the ATO must be notified if a reportable contravention under the SIS Act has occurred, is occurring or may occur. The contravention is made by lodging an Auditor Contravention Report (ACR) within 28 days of completing the audit.

However, if the ACR was sent to the ATO because of a genuine error then it can be cancelled. Genuine errors include:

  • lodging under the wrong fund ABN
  • providing incorrect information about the contravention based on the evidence you had in your possession at the time of reporting the contravention to us.

If the information received after lodging the ACR shows that the reported contravention was incorrect, didn’t occur, or has been rectified, a revised ACR should be lodged with the ATO. This can be done by using the ATO’s Online services for business to request a cancellation. If the ATO considers there are valid reasons for cancellation it will reply within 28 days of the request.

Issues with accountants’ wholesale investor certificates

In late June 2025 the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) handed down a decision Case number: 12-00-1080719 concerning an SMSF which had invested in Contracts for Difference (CFDs) on the basis that it was a wholesale investor for purposes of the Corporations Act 2001.

AFCA came to the conclusion that the SMSF was a retail client because the financial services provided by the financial firms involved related to a beneficial interest in the SMSF, which was a superannuation product, and the SMSF held less than $10 million in net assets as required under the Corporations Act 2001.

The decision in this case changed a longstanding understanding on the basis of an ASIC Media Release 14-191MR Statement on wholesale and retail investors and SMSFs | ASIC . It indicated that if a superannuation fund held less than $10 million in net assets that ASIC would no action if the advice provider determined that the trustee was a wholesale client based on the general net assets test of $2.5 million applying to the individual. As a general rule this was taken to assume that the SMSF could be treated as a wholesale client.

However, in its decision AFCA pointed out that the Media Release 14-191MR is not a definitive statement by ASIC that the general wholesale client test applies to SMSF trustees in relation to financial services these trustees receive. In effect, the release relates to ASIC not taking action in the circumstances indicated in the Media Release.

The AFCA decision was recently confirmed by their lead ombudsman, Shail Singh, and in the AFCA newsletter dated 19 June 2025 that the Corporations Act treats everyone as a retail investor unless you fall into a category of wholesale.

Qualified accountants who have been asked to provide wholesale investor certificate for purposes of Chapter 7 of the Corporations Act must understand when it can be given for an SMSF and that the net value of the fund’s assets are calculated correctly.



An update on Division 296 by Graeme Colley

Graeme Colley, who is a well-known expert in SMSFs and the Cloudoffis Independent Consultant, has provided an update on the latest developments for Div 296. 

What’s changed?

On 13 October, the government announced changes to the Div 296 tax proposal, which taxes increases in a member’s superannuation balance above $3 million.  The original proposal was placed under significant pressure by those who were impacted for many reasons.   These included no indexation of the $3 million threshold and the taxation of unrealised capital gains.  

The proposed changes still maintain the overall design of the legislation, which requires the tax to be paid by the member.  However, there are changes to the calculation of the amount to be taxed by excluding unrealised capital gains and introducing two thresholds at which the tax is payable.

The main changes to Div 296 announced by the Treasurer are:

Introduction of two thresholds

Div 296 tax will apply on balances above $3 million, and a further tax will apply on balances above $3 million.

Thresholds indexed

The two thresholds will be indexed in line with increases in CPI.  The $3 million cap will be indexed in increments of $150,000, and the $10 million threshold indexed in increments of $500,000.

Tax on ‘earnings’

The tax rate on the ‘earnings’ for balances above $3 million will be an extra 15% and a further tax of 10% applies if the member’s balance is greater than $10 million.  This means that a member who is wholly in the accumulation phase with a balance of between $3 million and $10 million will pay tax equal to 30% of their adjusted ‘income’, and those with a balance of more than $10 million will pay an additional amount equal to 40% of their adjusted ‘income’.

Calculation of the member’s adjusted ‘earnings’ for Div 296 purposes.

The calculation of a member’s total superannuation balance for Div 296 purposes will be adjusted for contributions, pension payments and other amounts.  The announced changes will now exclude unrealised capital gains, which was a controversial feature of the original proposal. 

If a member has a total amount in super greater than a threshold, the ATO contacts the relevant fund or funds to get further information so the adjustments can be made.  Any ‘earnings’ adjustment will be based on the fund’s taxable income.

Change in commencement date of Div 296

The proposed commencement date of the new tax is now 1 July 2026.  This means that Div 296 assessments will not be sent out to members until sometime in the 2027-28 financial year at the earliest.

Don’t forget that the government’s announcement on 13 October is not law.  There may be further changes when the legislation goes through the parliament, expected early in the new year.  As Div 296 is proposed to commence on 1 July 2026 don’t jump at shadows and make ad hoc decisions until the exact wording of the legislation is known and passed.

Further information on the government’s changes can be located on the Treasurer’s website and the Treasury website.

Want to ask Graeme about this?

Graeme will provide a detailed overview of the government’s Div 296 announcement at our Q&A webinar on 29 October

You can register for the webinar here. 

 

ATO SMSF Stats for the June Quarter 2025

ATO SMSF Stats for the June Quarter 2025

The latest SMSF quarterly statistics as at June 2025 were released in early September and highlight the continued growth of SMSFs. The ATO statistics show that there are 653,062 SMSFs which have a total of 1,203,127 members.

During the 2024/25 financial year, there was an increase of 38,449 funds, which was a substantial increase over each of the previous three years. Nearly two-thirds of the increase in SMSF memberships has come from the younger age groups. Although over 50% of members are in the 60+ age group.

SMSFs now hold over $1 trillion in assets, with the largest asset classes being listed shares, cash and term deposits.

The ATO’s SMSF quarterly statistical reports is available from the ATO website at
June 2025 ATO SMSF statistics

The latest update on Division 296

What is Division 296?

Division 296 refers to a section of the Australian Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997). It primarily deals with superannuation and the taxation of certain superannuation-related amounts.

Who does it affect?

  • Individuals with total superannuation balances over $3 million, starting from the 2025–26 financial year.
  • The extra tax applies only to the earnings on the portion of the balance above $3 million, not on the entire balance.

An update

Division 296 amends the income tax law to introduce an additional tax of up to 15% on the increase in a person’s Total Superannuation Balance for the year on balances above $3 million. It was intended to take effect from 1 July 2025.

Based on recent media reports, the government has paused the progression of the tax. If the legislation does make it into parliament, it may not be in the same form as the original bill, which lapsed on 21 July 2025. It may be better to wait until we see whether the legislation will go ahead and, if it does, whether any changes are made to the lapsed bills.

It is rumoured that the $3 million threshold may be indexed, which may relieve one of the main issues with the legislation. However, the member’s total superannuation balance, which is used to determine the threshold, may still include unrealised capital gains in the calculation. At the moment, it’s just wait and see what the government proposes to do.

To keep up to date, keep an eye on the Cloudoffis blog and also these sources below:

https://www.ato.gov.au/about-ato/new-legislation/in-detail/superannuation/better-targeted-superannuation-concessions?utm_source=chatgpt.com

https://treasury.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023-09/c2023-443986-em.pdf

https://ministers.treasury.gov.au/ministers/jim-chalmers-2022/media-releases/superannuation-tax-breaks

Cloudoffis marks growth with two new executive hires and new Sydney CBD headquarters

Sydney, 16 September 2025: Cloudoffis, Australia’s leading provider of cloud-based audit and compliance technology, has unveiled a series of expansion milestones as it accelerates growth beyond SMSF audit automation and into the wider accounting market.

The momentum is being driven by the rapid uptake of Tax Sorted, Cloudoffis’ newest product, launched in July 2024. Tax Sorted’s plug-and-play ease of use, Excel-based design, and powerful integrations with the ATO, Xero and FYI Docs has given Cloudoffis an immediate foothold across an estimated 60% of the accounting market.

 

In response to this growth, Cloudoffis has:

  • Appointed two senior leaders to newly created roles – John Munden as Chief Strategy Officer and Melissa Lawlor as Head of Growth.
  • Relocated its Sydney headquarters from Parramatta to 60 Martin Place, a prestigious CBD location closer to customers and partners.
  • Commenced a new wave of recruitment, with additional hires announced recently and more roles to be filled in the months ahead.

 

“This is a defining moment for Cloudoffis,” said Viral Kanabar, co-founder of Cloudoffis. For nearly a decade, we’ve been an innovator in SMSF audit automation, achieving 22% market share. With Tax Sorted, we’re unlocking the much larger accounting industry, both in Australia and globally. The move to Martin Place, creation of new leadership roles, and our growing team all reflect the scale of our ambition.”

 

As Chief Strategy Officer, Munden will steer the company’s long-term growth agenda, including opportunities to expand internationally into markets such as the UK and the US. He brings more than a decade of leadership experience scaling software and professional services businesses across Australia and the UK, including senior roles at Apple and Xero, leading transformation teams.

 

“Tax Sorted is reshaping expectations in the accounting software space,” said Munden. “It’s fast, intuitive and genuinely reduces workloads – helping firms save up to 30 minutes per job and cut review times in half. My focus will be ensuring Cloudoffis captures this momentum and translates it into lasting global impact.”

 

Melissa Lawlor, Cloudoffis’ new Head of Growth, will lead brand, marketing and customer experience strategy. A seasoned SaaS growth marketer, Lawlor brings more than 15 years of experience from roles at Dext (formerly Receipt Bank) and Deputy, where she specialised in demand generation and scaling customer adoption.

“What makes Tax Sorted so powerful is its accessibility,” said Lawlor. “Accounting firms can be up and running in minutes, which makes change management seamless. That’s a huge differentiator, and I’m excited to help drive the next phase of Cloudoffis’ growth story.”

 

“We’ve built a product accountants actually love using,” added Manish Sheladia, co-founder of Cloudoffis. “Our vision has always been to create simple, powerful tools that transform compliance. Tax Sorted is proving that vision extends well beyond SMSFs – and we’re just getting started.”

With strong foundations in SMSF audit automation and a rapidly expanding footprint in tax and compliance, Cloudoffis is positioning itself as a global leader in cloud-based accounting solutions.

 

For more information about Cloudoffis, please visit: https://cloudoffis.com.au 

 

About Cloudoffis
Cloudoffis is Australia’s leading cloud-based audit and compliance platform, trusted by SMSF auditors, administrators, and accountants. With more than 22% market share in SMSF audit automation, Cloudoffis is now transforming tax and compliance workflows through its new Tax Sorted product. By combining deep industry knowledge with innovative, plug-and-play technology, Cloudoffis streamlines processes, reduces risk, and helps practices deliver higher-value client service.

For further information or to arrange interviews, please contact:

Jasmine Turvey, Head of PR – Reverb Media

E: jasmine@reverb-media.com.au

P: 0437 762 320

Graeme’s Super News - September Edition

Read the latest updates from Graeme Colley, a respected educator, policy advisor, and technical expert with over 30 years' experience in taxation and superannuation.

ATO Auditor Compliance Program results for 2024–25

The ATO completed over 200 SMSF auditor reviews during the 2024–25 financial year.  They referred 41 auditors to ASIC for not complying with the audit and assurance standards and 36 auditors cancelled their registration.  

The main compliance issues included not obtaining sufficient and appropriate audit evidence for the auditor to form an opinion on the fund’s financial statements and whether the audited fund complied with the super laws.  There was also a lack of evidence that fund transactions were at arm’s length and not reporting the fund assets at their market value.

 

Separation of assets

The super law requires fund trustees to keep money and other assets of the fund separate from those held by the trustees individually or by a standard employer-sponsor or their associates.  

The ATO considers the fund assets must be held in the name of the trustee ‘as trustee for’ the fund.  This may not be possible in some cases where the law requires an asset to be held in the name of the legal owners rather than as trustees for the relevant fund.  In these cases, the auditor has an obligation to ensure the fund assets are legally owned by the fund, held by the trustees beneficially on behalf of the fund and are separate from the trustees’ personal or business assets.

Legal ownership can be evidenced by a declaration or acknowledgement of trust executed by the trustee over the fund’s asset.  Where this type of documentation is not available the trustees should seek legal advice.

If the fund does not separate its assets and comply with SIS regulations it is a reportable contravention.  The auditor should notify the trustees in writing of the breach and also the ATO via the SMSF Independent Audit Report if the contravention is material.  Also, the breach should be reported in an Audit Contravention Report if the ATO’s reporting criteria is met. 

 

What happens when a pension ceases?

The ATO’s opinion on when a pension commences and ceases is published in Taxation Ruling 2013/5.  While it is relatively clear when a pension commences it may cease suddenly for tax purposes when certain events occur. 

As a general rule a pension commences when all the capital with the purpose of supporting the income stream has been set aside in the fund.  The commencement day of the pension is the first day of the period to which it relates.

In contrast, the tax ruling points out that a pension ceases when there is no member or beneficiary entitled to receive it.  Examples include when:

  • the pension has a $nil balance, 
  • it has been converted (commuted) in full to a lump sum,
  • a person in receipt of a pension dies, and no one is entitled to automatically receive it,
  • the amount of the pension paid is less than the amount required under the SIS Act orthe  Commissioner’s General Powers of Administration, or
  • a child in receipt of a death benefit pension reaches age 25.

What the ruling does not tell you is that if a client has exceeded their Transfer Balance Cap and has received an excess transfer balance determination problems can arise.  In this situation the client has a number of options which include:

  • not commuting the excess amount notified in the determination in full by the due date, or
  • making an election for the ATO to send a commutation authority to the fund and have the excess commuted in full or in part. 

Where the:

  • income stream was commuted before the notice was received,
  • pensioner has died, or
  • notice was issued in relation to a capped defined benefit income stream (CDBIS)

the ATO is required to be notified of the event. 

 

If a member’s super fund has not commuted the excess amount as notified in the ATO’s commutation authority within 60 days of the issue date then the pension stops being in retirement phase.  This means the pension is treated as ceasing from the commencement of the relevant financial year.  Any income earned on the assets that were supporting the pension are taxed as though they are part of the fund’s accumulation phase assets. Any pension payments made to the member in the financial year are treated as lump sums.

It is possible to commence a new pension from the start of the next financial year.  However, the calculation of the new pension will be treated as if it has commenced from the fund’s accumulation phase assets.  This may result in the taxable and tax-free amounts being different from the previous pension. 

Accountants and auditors of SMSFs will need to be on the lookout for retirement phase pensions where the aggregate commencement values could be in excess of the member’s Transfer Balance Cap.  In these situations, they could expect the pensioner has been notified by the ATO that there is an excess amount which needs to be commuted.  If the fund has received a commutation authority then the accountant or auditor needs to confirm that the commutation has been made within 60 days of the issue date.  If this has not occurred then the fund will not be able to claim an earnings tax exemption for the relevant income stream in the income year or possibly for any later income years.

 

Crypto currency fact sheet

The value of crypto assets in SMSFs as at March 2025 was $1.675 billion.  As crypto assets are a relatively new asset class and increasing in popularity there are some fundamental issues that trustees and their professional advisers must become familiar with.  This includes accounting for the asset, it’s location, storage, ownership and access to the asset which may provide a challenge.

Because of the fluid and intangible nature of crypto assets proof of the existence may depend on getting access to relevant email accounts, mobile phones and other devices.  These store important asset information or are used as part of two-factor authentication or multi-factor authentication. Relying on these devices as information and storage sources creates a risk for the fund as investor.  There’s also the issue of whether the crypto assets can be located, accessed and accounted for including whether successor trustees or corporate trustees in the long term have a legal right and practical control to recover the crypto assets. 

The ATO has released a Tax and crypto asset investments factsheet to assist professionals and their clients when preparing fund accounts.  It includes the records that need to be kept for crypto assets including income tax and CGT

 

 

 

Xerocon got Sorted

The team at Cloudoffis are absolutely thrilled to have attended our first Xerocon. The Xero community got their Tax Sorted over 2 days during 3-4 September. 

Cloudoffis showcased our newest product Tax Sorted, which instantly blew people away with its simplicity and ease of use. Setup is super easy, just log in with your Xero account, plug and play, and you’re ready to go!

Some of the features that accountants really loved were our relationship chart, the working trial balance (journals), job notes and the ability to auto populate workpapers – linking workpapers across job. We even had people start their 30 day free trial while seeing a demo!!

One thing which Xero’s Chief Product Officer highlighted during a presentation is that “You told us loudly and clearly, a truly streamlined compliance workflow requires us to have a complete workpaper solution that is deeply connected to bookkeeping and tax”. Cloudoffis couldn’t agree more, and the best part is that you don’t have to wait!

Tax sorted – our AI-powered workpapers are live today, with seamless integrations with Xero, FYI and the ATO. 

Here are some highlights from the event! And if you haven’t seen Tax Sorted yet, jump in and have a play with our 30 day free trial!

Image 1 Image 2 Image 3
Image 4 Image 5 Image 6
Image 7 Image 8 Image 9

August 2025 Ask Graeme Webinar

In October 2023 the Treasury Laws Amendment (Better Targeted Superannuation Concessions) Bill 2023 and the Superannuation (Better Targeted Superannuation Concessions) Imposition Bill were released for public consultation and introduced into the Parliament in November 2023.

On 7 December 2023 the Senate referred the bills to the Senate Economics Legislation Committee which handed down its report on 10 May 2024. The committee’s recommendation was that the bills be passed as they stood. The bills were passed by the House of Representatives in October 2024 and introduced in the Senate on 21 October 2024 but lapsed on 21 July 2025 at the end of the previous parliament. The matter is expected to be reintroduced into the parliament during the Spring 2025 sittings. The reintroduced bills may differ from the previous bills that lapsed at the end of the previous parliament.

In broad terms, the originally proposed Div 296 tax is:

  • intended to apply from the 2025/26 financial year if a member’s adjusted total superannuation balance is greater than $3 million (unindexed).
  • calculated on the proportion of the member’s adjusted total superannuation balance above $3 million at the end of each financial year,
  • levied as a 15 per cent tax on the proportion of the growth in an individual’s “superannuation earnings”, including unrealised capital gains. The earnings is calculated as the increase in the member’s total superannuation balance (TSB) at the commencement and adjusted TSB at the end of the relevant year of income commencing after 1 July 2025,
  • not applied to reductions in the member’s TSB at the end of the financial year. Negative earnings above the $3 million cap are quarantined and used to offset future earnings under the calculation of a person’s superannuation earnings for a future year of income. The offset of losses does not result in a refund of any previous tax paid.
  • proposed to be levied directly on the member and imposed separately to personal income tax and superannuation fund tax. The member may elect to pay the tax personally or have it paid from the balance in their superannuation fund or funds of which they belong, similar to Div 293 tax.

An individual’s TSB as at the end of the relevant financial year will be used to determine whether a liability for the Div 296 tax arises. That liability occurs only if the individual’s TSB is greater than $3 million and there are taxable superannuation earnings based on their adjusted TSB. To set the record straight and clarify any misconceptions, it is a misnomer to say that the combined tax payable on the fund’s investment income in accumulation phase (15%) and the Div 296 tax (also 15%) will be 30% in aggregate.

Question

How will Div 296 work for SMSF asset valuations?

Certain exemptions from the Division 296 tax apply to:

  • minors in receipt of a superannuation income stream such as a death benefit pension following the death of a parent or other person of which the child is a dependant for superannuation purposes,
  • anyone where a structured settlement payment (personal injury payment) has been made to superannuation. This applies regardless of whether the structured settlement amount was made in the relevant year of determining whether the Div 296 tax applies or in an earlier year,
  • a person who died during the year in which the Div 296 is being determined. The only exception is where the deceased died on 30 June in the financial year.

There are three stages involved in determining whether Div 296 tax is to be levied on an individual. These are:

  1. calculation of ‘superannuation earnings’ based on the individual’s adjusted TSB at the end of the financial year,
  2. calculating the proportion of earnings attributable to balances above $3 million, and
  3. calculating the tax liability.

Stage 1


Calculate the ‘superannuation earnings’

The member’s ‘superannuation earnings’ for Div 296 purposes is calculated as the increase in their TSB on 30 June in the previous financial year which is adjusted for contributions and withdrawals during the relevant year of income. For the first year in which the legislation applies the adjusted TSB as at 30 June 2026 is the TSB at 30 June 2025 less ‘contributions’ plus ‘withdrawals’.

The adjusted TSB is reduced by any concessional contributions, less the 15% tax payable, and non-concessional contributions made to the fund. Withdrawals, such as income stream payments or lump sums paid to the member are added back to the calculation. The calculation of superannuation earnings is:

Superannuation Earnings = Current year adjusted TSB – previous year TSB

If the previous year TSB is less than $3 million, then an amount of $3 million, referred to as the large balance superannuation threshold, is substituted as Div 296 tax is designed only to apply to adjusted TSBs that lie above that amount.

The adjusted TSB in the superannuation earnings formula is calculated as:

Adjusted TSB = TSB for the current financial year + lump sum and pension withdrawals for the year – any contributions for the year.

The information for calculating the adjusted TSB is sourced from the fund’s annual returns. However, some information such as an individual’s pension payment details and whether personal contributions have been claimed as tax deductions may need to be included.

The adjusted TSB includes amounts withdrawn from the fund by the member during the year which are added back to the TSB as at the end of the financial year and any contributions for the year are deducted from the TSB.

Adjusted Total Superannuation Balance – pension withdrawals for the year

The total of the following amounts paid from the individual’s superannuation interests (accumulation and retirement phase balances) during the year are added back to the TSB at the end of the year of income:

• a superannuation benefit payment, such as a lump sum,

• superannuation benefits transferred via spousal contribution splitting,

• superannuation benefits transferred to another person via a family payment split,

• amounts withheld from an excess untaxed rollover amount,

• amounts released under a valid requested release authority (E.g. Division 293, excess NCC or first home super saver amount released),

• any amounts described by regulations. It should be noted that there are no draft regulations currently available.

Adjusted Total Superannuation Balance – contributions for the year

Contributions for the year equal the total of the following amounts received into the individual’s superannuation fund(s) during the year:

• contributions made to the individual’s superannuation fund. In the case of concessional contributions 85% of the amount is deducted from the TSB and for non-concessional contributions the whole of the amount is deducted,

• contributions spitting superannuation benefit payments made to a spouse’s superannuation balance,

• family law superannuation payments made due to a payment split and added to the recipient’s account,

• the TSB value of a superannuation death benefit interest when the individual becomes a retirement phase recipient of the death benefit,

• a death or total and permanent disability insurance payment or contingent beneficiary payment (with the exception of continuous disability payments such as a disability pension),

• any amounts allocated to the individual’s superannuation plan that are captured within the meaning of concessional contributions under s291-25(3) such as certain transfers from reserves,

• a transfer from a foreign superannuation fund,

• the increase in TSB value of a superannuation interest as a result of a remuneration payment or compensation for loss as a result of fraud or dishonesty,

• any amounts prescribed by regulations.

Stage 2


Calculate the proportion of the earnings attributable to the balance above $3 million

This part of the calculation is to ensure the proportion of the increase in the TSB that lies above the $3 million cap is brought to tax. It is worked out by determining the percentage of the TSB at the end of the relevant year that is above the $3 million cap threshold as:

(Individual^’ s TSB at the end of the year-large superannuation balance threshold)/(Invididual^’ s TSB at the end of the year) ×100

Note: The proportion is calculated using TSB (less LRBA amounts) and not the adjusted TSB which is used to calculate the superannuation earnings.
(Proposed s 296-35(2))

Stage 3


Calculate Tax Liability

The ‘tax liability’ is then determined by multiplying both ‘earnings’ and ‘proportion of earnings’ as calculated above in Steps 1 and 2 by the 15% tax rate:
Div 296 Liability=15% ×Taxable Superannuation Earnings (Earnings ×Proportion of Earnings)

(Proposed s 296-35(1))

Examples

The case studies of Stephen and Toni that follow illustrate the calculation of Div 296 tax and any adjustments to the individual’s TSB that are required.

EXAMPLE

Stephen

  • Stephen is 65 and has a total superannuation balance of $4 million as at 30 June 2025, 
  • On 30 June 2026 Steven’s balance is $4.5 million,
  • He has made no withdrawals and no contribution to superannuation

Steven’s calculated earnings are:

Steven’s earnings equals $4.5 million – $4 million = $500,000 as he has not made any withdrawals or contributions.
The proportion of Steven’s earnings above $3 million is:


Where:

Tax liability for the 2025-26 year is:

Where:

Effective tax rate of Div 296 tax on the fund’s total assets:

EXAMPLE

Toni
Toni’s case study provides 3 possible scenarios which illustrate the impact of Div 296 tax where increasing amounts are withdrawn from the fund:
Scenario
Toni withdraws an income stream in retirement phase and makes concessional contributions.
Toni’s circumstances

  • Toni is age 66 and has a TSB on 30 June 2025 of $5 million,
  • On 30 June 2026 Toni’s TSB is $5.3 million,
  • During the 2025-26 financial year she withdraws a pension of $200,000 during the year,
  • Made a concessional contribution of $20,000 during the year, $17,000 net of tax,
  • For purposes of Scenario 2 Toni withdraws a lump sum of $500,000,
  • For purposes of Scenario 3 Toni withdraws a lump sum of $1 million

Scenario 1
Toni’s calculated earnings in scenario 1 are:

Toni’s earnings equals $5.3 million – $5 million + $200,000 – $17,000 = $483,000 in view of  withdrawals and contributions that have been made.
The proportion of Toni’s earnings above $3 million is:

Where:

Tax liability for the 2025-26 year is:

Where:

Effective tax rate of Div 296 tax on the fund’s total assets on 30 June 2026:

Summary

TSB 30 June 2025

TSB 30 June 2026

Pension

Lump sum

Concessional Contribution after 15% tax

Adjusted TSB as at 30 June 2026

$5,000,000

$5,300,000

$200,000

0

$17,000

$5,483,000

Proportion of superannuation earnings > $3 million

Div 296 tax liability

 

Effective tax rate on the fund’s total assets on 30 June 2026

43%

$31,441

0.593%

Main Issues with Division 296

The operation of Div 296 and the manner in which the tax liability is calculated has a number of issues which need to be considered.  These will determine whether superannuation continues to be as attractive as in the past.  The two main concerns with Div 296 are:

  • the taxation of the ‘growth’ element in a member’s TSB over the year of income including the imposition of tax on unrealised capital gains on a year-by-year basis, and
  • the lack of indexation of the ‘large superannuation threshold’ of $3 million.

In addition to these main issues there is also:

  • valuation of fund assets on a market value basis,
  • discrimination in the flexibility to withdraw benefits for those who meet or don’t meet a condition of release as part of the introduction of Div 296 tax,
  • payment of the tax from the fund, especially SMSFs, which may have a significant proportion of the fund in illiquid assets,
  • no notional CGT discount in calculating the adjusted TSB on assets that have been owned by the fund for greater than 12 months,
  • No opportunity to equalise balances between spouses prior to the introduction of Div 296 tax,
  • at the time the legislation was released in October 2023 it was estimated that 80,000 members would be impacted on an ongoing basis by the introduction of Div 296.  If the proposed legislation commences on 1 July 2025 the number of members impacted by Div 296 tax is likely to increase beyond that estimate,
  • there is no adjustment to losses carried forward if the member’s adjusted TSB falls below the $3 million threshold, and.
  • effective double tax on taxable capital gains and unrealised capital gains attributable to the adjusted TSB above the member’s $3 million cap.

When will the $3 million cap become an issue?
It is difficult to predict when the impact of Div 296 tax will become an issue as it depends on the  particular circumstances of the member involved.  Those circumstances, not in any particular order, depend on:

  • The member’s current TSB and the adjusted TSB,
  • The income and capital growth of fund assets,
  • The amount of contributions made over time in respect of the member by their employer, the member and others,
  • The rate of increase in the indexation of the contribution caps and the total superannuation balance cap.
  • The amount withdrawn from the fund during the year as lump sums and pensions
  • The member’s age,
  • The age of the member’s spouse,
  • Whether the member satisfies a condition of release,

Before alternative arrangements to superannuation are considered it is probably worthwhile to  consider strategies which take advantage of the current superannuation rules to reduce or possibly eliminate the impact of Div 296.
Who will be impacted immediately by Div 296?
Members under age 60?
The main group of fund member’s immediately impacted by Div 296 are those:

  • those under age 60,
  • not meeting a condition of release with a ‘nil’ cashing restriction, and
  • have a TSB of more than the $3 million cap or will approach the cap amount within a relatively short period. 

This group has little flexibility to reduce their TSB below the $3 million threshold and as a general proposition are locked into superannuation by the preservation rules until at least age 60.  Access to superannuation prior to that age is available if certain limited conditions of release are satisfied, such as permanent disability.
It is possible for those under age 60 to make micro changes to their superannuation balances.  However, these changes, such as splitting concessional contributions to their spouse, have a limited impact on the person’s TSB.
Member aged 60 or older?
There is a potential escape hatch for anyone 60 or older If Div 296 happens to become law and the individual wishes to reduce their liability.  The immediate impact of Div 296 is most likely to be on anyone who is at least age 60, has superannuation earnings for the 2025-26 financial year and a TSB on 30 June 2026 of greater than the ‘large superannuation threshold’ of $3 million.
Anyone meeting a condition of release prior to the commencement of Div 296 with unrestricted non-preserved benefits may wish to use the flexibility to withdraw sufficient from the fund and stay below the $3 million cap.  Conditions of release to gain access to benefits may include:

  • meeting a condition of release of retirement for superannuation purposes,
  • reaching age 65, or
  • commencing a transition to retirement income stream (TRIS) from age 60.

However, an individual may require that adjustments occur prior to 30 June 2025 as they may think that the impact of the Div 296 tax can be eliminated for the 2025-26 financial year.  However, the case study above shows that in some cases the Div 296 tax payable will depend on the individual’s TSB on 30 June 2026 and not their adjusted TSB.
Anyone between the ages of 60 and 65 who does not meet a condition of release with a ‘nil’ cashing restriction may wish to commence a transition to retirement income stream (TRIS).  The reason is that the balance of the TRIS is not measured against the individual’s Transfer Balance Cap (TBC) until an individual has retired for superannuation purposes or reached age 65. Irrespective of the individual’s balance in the fund, the whole balance may be used to commence a TRIS and provide them with an income stream of up to 10% of its opening balance for the financial year.  However, care should be taken for those approaching a condition of release with a ‘nil’ cashing restriction such as age 65 because the TRIS then falls into retirement phase and is counted for purposes of the member’s TBC.

EXAMPLE

 

Dina
Consider Dina who is age 60.  She does not meet a condition of release with a ‘nil’ cashing restriction and has not retired for superannuation purposes.  She expects that her TSB on 30 June 2025 is likely to be $3.2 million.   
Prior to the commencement of the 2025-26 financial year, she decides to commence a TRIS with the total of her fund balance as at 1 June 2025.  She withdraws the maximum TRIS which is equal to her balance in the fund and an income stream equal to 10% of that balance ($320,000) without any pro rating of the amount withdrawn.  As at 30 June 2025 her TSB is $2,880,000.  If Dina’s adjusted TSB remained under the $3 million cap as at 30 June 2026 she would not be subject to Div 296 tax.  This would also be possible if Dina withdrew an amount during the 2025-26 financial year and on 30 June 2026 her TSB.
As another possible alternative, Dina could commence a part-time casual job and cease working in that job.  The cessation of the job after Dina has reached age 60 will mean she meets a condition of release of retirement.  She has ceased gainful employment after reaching age 60 for purposes of reg 6.01(7) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Regulations 1994 (SISR).  This allows her to withdraw a lump sum or commence an allocated pension which will be subject to her TBC, which is currently $1.9 million.
If Dina decided to delay commencement of the pension until the 2025-26 financial year, the amount withdrawn would be added back to her TSB.  If that meant that the adjusted TSB was greater than the $3 million cap then she may be liable to Div 296 tax for the 2025-26 financial year if her TSB on 30 June 2026 is also greater than $3 million.  Even if her TSB on 30 June 2026 was greater than $3 million it is possible that commencing the pension during the year may reduce her Div 296 liability as in the earlier case study of Toni.

One issue that arises with the withdrawal of a pension or lump sum from the fund is answering the question, ‘What will the member do with the amount received if they don’t need it to live on?’  There is no end to the possible answers which could include investing it, buying a new residence, an overseas trip or even putting it under the bed.

Division 296 tax – is it best to move to tax-effective accounting if Div 296 becomes law?

As a general practice, many funds do not use tax effect accounting and the decision to use must be considered on a case by case basis.  As the accounts are not general purpose financial statements then the ultimate decision is up to the fund trustees and the fund’s accountant.  A note in the fund’s accounts should reflect whether tax effect accounting is being used.
There may be consequences for a fund that starts using tax effect accounting if it is not currently being used by the fund.  As a general rule, tax effect accounting recognises the fund’s tax liability assuming that all the assets are disposed of at the end of each financial year.  However, if the assumed disposal of assets results in a loss then it may result in a deferred tax asset.
When Division 296 tax is being considered deferred tax accounting will recognise the tax payable if the asset were sold on 30 June.  This raises a tax liability provision for deferred tax in the fund’s statement of financial position or balance sheet.
For example if the fund owns a property and it is increasing in value then by using tax effect accounting the member balances will be lower at the year-end because of the notional tax calculation.  The member’s total superannuation balance will also be lower and therefore the Division 296 tax would be expected to be lower too.
However, while at first blush the use of tax effect accounting may seem attractive the ongoing impact may not be as clear.  This would occur when the asset is disposed of and when capital gains are calculated.  The reason is that the use of tax effect accounting may reduce the member’s total superannuation balance on a year by year basis. 
When the asset is eventually disposed of the member’s total superannuation balance would take the capital gain without any reduction for the amount of tax previously taken into account when calculating the member’s total superannuation balance.  The same effect would occur if a member was in accumulation phase and part of that balance was used to commence an income stream.
The ultimate effect by using tax effect accounting is a timing difference.  This would resolve itself when the asset was disposed of or part of the member’s benefit was used to commence an income stream.  The result is that the member’s total superannuation balance would be no different after the sale or commencement of the income stream due to the tax effect adjustment.
Tax effect accounting does not necessarily mean that the member’s Division 296 outcome will be improved.  Whether it is useful may depend on a number of factors based on the member’s particular circumstances.  Don’t forget that if the ATO considers that the purpose of using tax effect accounting to reduce a person’s total superannuation balance and avoid Div 296 tax it may fall foul of Part IVA of the tax law.

What is the current state of the art with Division 296 tax?

As indicated above, the Treasury Laws Amendment (Better Targeted Superannuation Concessions) Bill 2023 and the Superannuation (Better Targeted Superannuation Concessions) Imposition Bill were passed by the House of Representatives in October 2024 and introduced in the Senate on 21 October 2024 but lapsed on 21 July 2025 at the end of the previous parliament.  The matter is expected to be reintroduced into the parliament during the Spring 2025 sittings.  The reintroduced bills may differ from the previous bills that lapsed at the end of the previous parliament.