SMSF Update: What the ATO Is Watching, New LRBA Rules & How to Prepare Your Annual Return

smsf update

With the ATO increasing scrutiny on SMSFs, new LRBA rules taking effect from 10 August 2026, and annual return season approaching, here’s what trustees need to know and act on now.

Graeme Colley, a respected educator, policy advisor, and technical expert with over 30 years’ experience in taxation and superannuation is back with a new blog post covering key updates for SMSFs.

The regulatory environment for self-managed super funds continues to evolve, and 2026 brings a number of developments that trustees cannot afford to overlook. The Australian Taxation Office has sharpened its focus on SMSF compliance, market valuations of fund assets remain a key area of scrutiny, and significant changes to Limited Recourse Borrowing Arrangements take effect from 10 August 2026. With annual return lodgement deadlines on the horizon, now is the time to ensure your fund is in order. In this update, Graeme Colley, SMSF Advisor at Cloudoffis, walks through the key issues trustees should be across – and the steps you should be taking today.

ATO on the Lookout?

You can expect that the ATO will be on the lookout this year with several audit and compliance areas expected to receive attention.

One area which is expected to receive greater attention will be asset valuations and fund documents due to the introduction of Division 296. Valuations for these purposes will rely heavily on accurate and supportable asset valuations. Auditors may request additional evidence for assets which have not been requested previously but may form part of their annual compliance review.

Under the new legislation, it is possible for a trustee to reset the cost base of all its assets as at 30 June 2026 solely for the purposes of Div 296. The resetting of the cost base requires the trustees to make an election prior to the lodgement of the fund’s 2026/27 annual return.

Market Valuations of Fund Assets

As a result of the ATO’s increased attention to the value of the fund’s assets, auditors are more likely to require trustees to obtain and retain appropriate valuation evidence each year.  

Therefore, trustees should make sure they have the following documents ready prior to the fund’s audit:

  • For a fund that has unlisted private company and trust investments, annual valuations will be required to be supported by documentation on how the value was determined.  Information which is provided in the financial statements is usually not sufficient to prove the valuation.
  • It will be similar for a fund that owns real estate which will require property valuations annually that substantiates how the value was determined.  Again, information provided in the fund’s financial statements is usually not sufficient to support the value of the property.  While desktop valuations may be acceptable for most residential properties in the case of commercial property a more detailed report is required.

In some cases valuation documents may need to be obtained from trustees, related entities, valuers or other advisers to assist with the annual compliance and audit process. 

Things to do before lodging the fund’s annual return

The ATO has recently published some of the most common errors in SMSF annual returns.  They have pointed out that they can be simple administrative errors where the information is invalid or missing from the fund’s return.  Small oversights can lead to delays in processing and result in a rework of the return for the fund’s tax agent or the auditor.

Some of the more common issues with missing information in the return are:

  • Completing all mandatory fields:  Mandatory fields in the return where the information hasn’t changed since last year need to be completed.  For the 2025/26 annual return information concerning the audit fees in Section C at labels H1 and H2 of the return are now mandatory.   Another area is incomplete auditor details are another common issue.
  • Information such as the correct auditor registration number, auditor name and date the audit was completed are invalid or missing. 
  • The return has been lodged with the ATO prior to completion of the fund’s audit.  The SIS Act requires that an audit of the fund must have been completed and the trustee has received a copy of it prior to lodgement of the fund’s return.
  • Member information is another area where errors are made such as missing or invalid member TFNs.  The ATO recommends that the member’s TFN should be confirmed against client records rather than relying on pre-filled or previously lodged information.
  • Errors in dates is another recurring issue as they may be entered incorrectly or in the wrong format. Reviewing key dates, such as the financial year end and audit completion date, can help catch these errors early.
  • As some information included in the return uses drop down menus, they should be used rather than manually entering values to avoid any mismatches with the approved lists.
  • Finally, sometimes ‘yes’ or ‘no’ boxes are sometimes missing or invalid and can result in the processing of the fund’s return being delayed or rejected.

LRBA Changes from 10 August 2026

In our previous newsletter we included some information on this year’s budget announcement which  prohibited SMSFs from establishing new limited recourse borrowing arrangements (LRBA) investing in residential property from 10 August this year.  Unfortunately, the changes did not include any explanation of whether any arrangements entered into prior to commencement of the legislation but not finalised before 10 August would be treated.

The ATO recently clarified when new LRBAs would be quarantined and excluded from the new  legislation.  They say that the new rules will not apply if an SMSF exchanges a binding contract to acquire real property before 10 August 2026.  It will apply even if the contract is settled or the documentation establishing the LRBA is entered into on or after 10 August 2026.

Also, later variations of the contract will not change whether the original arrangement will be quarantined.  However, if a contract is changed significantly and the fundamental terms no longer exist, it may be considered that a new arrangement has begun. 

LRBA Offset Accounts

Some LRBAs have accounts with financial institutions which have offset account arrangements.   Many of the offset arrangements are with Authorised Deposit-taking Institutions (ADI) such as banks but others include arrangements with finance companies which are not ADIs.  We understand that auditors will continue to review offset account arrangements, particularly where the lender is not an ADI as the type of account structure may create compliance issues with the fund.  This could relate to: 

  • Withdrawals from the ‘offset account’ being treated as redraws under the loan arrangement; or 
  • The offset account is subject to a charge or security interest. 

If the LRBA enters into either of these arrangements it is possible that may have breached section 67A.

If you’d like to speak to one of the Cloudoffis experts, you can reach out here.

The Cloudoffis Platform

Cloudoffis provides the Accounting and Auditing community with cloud-based, AI-powered software designed to simplify compliance and optimise firm workflows.

Streamlining workpapers for Australian Accountants

 

Deliver structured and compliant SMSF workpapers to auditors in just one click.

Improve SMSF auditing turnaround time through automation and insights.

Related Posts

Products